Moderators: JulesTheBit, Peter Taylor, Trinityman, Burnham, middlepillar, staffs, Peter Dowling, MrBenn, Peter Moir


JJ wrote:I forgot to add a comment about the difference between English and Irish workings. There is much less ritual for the principle officers to learn in the Irish workings as most of it is done by an officer with no equivalent in the English ritual. JJ

asabovesobelow wrote:JJ wrote:I forgot to add a comment about the difference between English and Irish workings. There is much less ritual for the principle officers to learn in the Irish workings as most of it is done by an officer with no equivalent in the English ritual. JJ
Does this particular office have a name attached to it?






mgreene1036 wrote:If this cannot be done 100% perfect it should either be read or delegated.




Chestnut wrote:Very few eople can deliver the ritaul 100% perfect. For those who can silver matchboxes are available. See how few of those have been given!



Chestnut wrote:Word perfect read ritual does not necessarily mean either the reader or recipient understands it. If its commended to memory you have more chance of understanding it and living by it.

Huw wrote:In addition, when Brethren are reading ritual, it is more difficult to put some feeling and meaning into the words. I have occasionally heard a ritual read with feeling and meaningful intonation, but only by Brethren who could actually have managed fairly well without the book. When you know the work, you can pay some attention to how you are saying it; those who don't know the work are usually too busy reading the next words to give a good delivery.


Return to What can be done to Improve Freemasonry
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest